Sat 3 Mar 2007
Two interesting pieces of news this week. One from Berlin and the other from New York, and both have caused wide debates on freedom of speech and how far these bannings can go.
In Berlin, there are attempts by their interior minister to ban the usage of the name Jihad after a Turkish Muslim caused a public debate when he called his son Jihad.
Berlin’s City Police Department argues that naming the boy Jihad goes against the child’s interest. The district council originally argued that a name “associated with terrorism” could “endanger the child’s well-being.”
In New York, on the other hand, there is an attempt to ban the “n-word” in an attempt to take it out of the mainstream and especially the rap and hip hop scene.
The resolution, which never actually names the term, referring to it only as “the ‘N’ word,” passed with unanimous support on Wednesday, the last day of Black History Month.
=========================================================
I obviously disagree with both plans to ban words.
The New York ‘n-word’ ban is not a legally binding law, but its a suggestion. Personally, I don’t like the word and would be happy to see it stopped being used in the mainstream, but again, banning it would be just stupid!!
Banning an offensive word will just open the door for more bans on other phrases and words!
For the name Jihad, it is very stupid of them to try and ban a name that has been around for thousands of years and has very historic and cultural significance! The fact that the word has been misused or has had a bad conotation in the past 5 or 6 years doesn’t make it right to ban it based on that, especially in a place like Berlin, which is known for being very liberal and open-minded!
On the other hand, someone living in the west should have the sensibilty not to use that name in the current situation! The guy who called his kid Jihad is obviously a publicity seeker, he spoke on TV previously approving of the Sept 11th attacks and the Bali attacks, and Jihad is his 6th son! The guy is an ass but putting a law banning the name is just ridiculous!
7 Responses to “Banning words and freedom of speech”
Leave a Reply
Visitor stats
-
user(s) online
so far

March 3rd, 2007 at 9:40 am
I wouldn’t have been surprised if he was a palestinian. 3ade Abul3abed. half a dozen is just getting warmed up. Allah y5aleehom
March 3rd, 2007 at 10:38 am
Hehe, Q you reminded me of an essay I read a while ago by Terry Jones (yes, the python) about fighting things by fighting their names.
Check it out
March 3rd, 2007 at 12:43 pm
FREEDOM OF SPEECH is our Gurantee words will never hurt.
March 3rd, 2007 at 1:20 pm
Ban words and names?
this is rediculus!
i can call my kid hitler or saddam!
kaifee, no one has the rite to tell me not to do so.
sure the guy is stupid but its his kid!
March 3rd, 2007 at 3:04 pm
Germany has name laws. You can only name your child from a list of certain names. This comes up time and time again - it could be Solitude or Fornication as well as Jihad. It doesn’t make any difference, if it is outside the realm of what Germans perceive as “normal,” it isn’t allowed.
March 3rd, 2007 at 3:47 pm
I ban the word Q! Yes the letter is actually a word!
March 5th, 2007 at 8:16 pm
I think its ridiculous to base a name such as Jihad on terrorism. It just goes to show that ppl really have a very limited intelligence.They shud understand that what these extreme muslims are doing is NOT what jihad really is.
And banning the “N” word… I mean cmon, lets be for real here. If there guna ban that word, ppl are just guna come out with sumthin more offensive. And rappers are using that word to describe their own selfs in their songs, so I guess its not really that bad of a word if they use it. I personally hate that word and wud never use it, but thats what freedom of speech is all about.
People need to get a clue and stop trying to ban words!!! What abt drugs, child trafficking,etc… There are plenty more important things out there to take care of!!
Wouldnt you agree?